P2-157 A Comparative Evaluation of the GeneDisc® Plate Listeria Identification Kit for the Identification of Listeria Species

Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Exhibit Hall (Rhode Island Convention Center)
Patrice Chablain, Pall GeneDisc Technologies, Bruz, France
Helene Beaupied, Pall GeneDisc Technologies, Bruz, France
Sylvie Hallier-Soulier, Pall GeneDisc Technologies, Bruz, France
Erin Crowley, Q Laboratories, Inc., Cincinnati, OH
Patrick Bird, Q Laboratories, Inc., Cincinnati, OH
Kiel Fisher, Q Laboratories, Inc., Cincinnati, OH
Travis Huffman, Q Laboratories, Inc., Cincinnati, OH
M. Joseph Benzinger, Q Laboratories, Inc., Cincinnati, OH
James Agin, Q Laboratories, Inc., Cincinnati, OH
David Goins, Q Laboratories, Inc., Cincinnati, OH
Introduction:   The GeneDisc® Plate Listeria Identification Kit enables the identification and discrimination of 6 Listeria species from isolated colonies utilizing Real-Time PCR technology.  Sample DNA is extracted from isolated colonies on one of 6 different agars, combined with Master Mix reagent, sealed and analyzed using the Cycler. Up to 8 plates containing 6 or 12 samples can be analyzed at one time with each plate containing positive and negative control wells to validate sample analysis. 

Purpose: The purpose of this internal validation was to evaluate the ruggedness, product consistency, stability, instrument variation and inclusivity/exclusivity of the candidate method and compare it to the FDA/BAM and USDA/FSIS-MLG biochemical confirmation process as part of the AOAC-RI™ PTM validation.

Methods: A method comparison of 10 food matrices and 2 environmental surfaces was conducted using the GeneDisc® Plate Listeria ID and the FDA/BAM or USDA/FSIS-MLG reference methods.  For confirmation of samples by the ID method, each matrix was streaked to 6 different agars (MOX, OX OAA, Palcam, Rapid‘L.mono™ and Nutrient Agar). Typical Listeria colonies from each agar were picked for identification by the candidate method. Inclusivity/exclusivity, stability, product consistency and instrument variation parameters were evaluated.

Results: For the method comparison, the candidate method correctly identified 722 out of 727 isolates (99.3%). For inclusivity, 837 out of 840 isolates (99.6%) were correctly identified. All 30 exclusivity organisms were correctly excluded. The robustness results indicated minor variations to testing parameters had no effect on final results. Stability results indicate performance was consistent over the 6 month shelf life. Product consistency and instrument variation results demonstrate consistency between lots of assay and instruments.

Significance: The candidate method demonstrated high specificity in the identification and discrimination of Listeria species.