P1-105 A Longitudinal Study on Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella enterica, and Listeria monocytogenes Isolated from Ready-to-Eat Meat Processing Facilities

Monday, July 23, 2012
Exhibit Hall (Rhode Island Convention Center)
Alex Brandt, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX
Eva Borjas, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
John Sofos, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
Martin Wiedmann, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Kendra Nightingale, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX
Introduction: Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella enterica, and Listeria monocytogenes are foodborne pathogens of public health importance that present a significant food safety challenge to meat processors in the US. Knowledge gaps currently exist regarding the ecology, transmission, and persistence of these microorganisms in the food processing environment. Filling these gaps can facilitate development of methods to mitigate persistence, especially for small and very small facilities with limited resources.

Purpose: The objectives of this study were to conduct longitudinal sampling of 2 ready-to-eat (RTE) meat processing facilities to probe the ecology of E. coli O157:H7, S. enterica, and L. monocytogenes, to identify harborage sites where pathogens persist, and to assemble a set of isolates from harborage sites. 

Methods: Briefly, sponge samples of environmental sites, food contact surfaces, and finished products were collected from the 2 facilities over a 6 month period. Up to 55 sites in each facility were sampled monthly with 3 sponge samples (for individual pathogens) taken from adjacent locations at each site. Samples were processed following modified versions of the USDA-FSIS Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook protocols 4.05, 5.05, and 8.07 for isolation of S. enterica, E. coli O157:H7, and L. monocytogenes, respectively.

Results: Five samples from Facility B (1.5%) were positive for S. enterica, but no sampling site produced S. enterica on more than 1 occasion. L. monocytogenes was detected in 11.2% of the samples collected from Facility A, while 14.7% of the samples from Facility B were positive for L. monocytogenes. Ten and 12 sites tested positive for L. monocytogenes on more than 1 sampling date in Facility A and Facility B, respectively. E. coli O157:H7 was not isolated from either facility over the course of the study, and S. enterica was not detected in Facility A.

Significance: These data suggest that E. coli O157:H7 and S. enterica are likely only transiently present in RTE meat processing facilities, while environmental persistence of L. monocytogenes in RTE meat plant harborage sites may be more common.