Purpose: This study was a parallel comparison between the DIG-ELISA C. botulinumtoxin kits and the commercially available Tetracore ELISA A, B, E, and F kits for detection of BoNT in foods.
Methods: Six brands each of canned chili, sausage, and luncheon meat were fortified at five levels of BoNT A, B, E, and F, and cold stressed overnight. Each sample was replicated eight times over four days. Samples were homogenized with GBS and toxins were extracted via centrifugation. The aqueous layers were filtered, prepared, and analyzed in parallel according to manufacturer’s instructions on the Tetracore and DIG-ELISA methods for each toxin specific type.
Results: Limit of Detection (ng/g) of BoNT Types A, B, E, and F in Foods
ELISA Method |
Chili |
Luncheon Meat |
Sausage |
|||||||||
A |
B |
E |
F |
A |
B |
E |
F |
A |
B |
E |
F |
|
Tetracore |
25 |
5-10 |
5 |
5 |
>50 |
50 |
500 |
5 |
>50 |
50 |
100 |
5 |
DIG |
10 |
>50 |
5 |
5 |
10-25 |
>50 |
5 |
5 |
10-50 |
>50 |
5 |
5 |
Significance: While the DIG-ELISA method was more sensitive in the detection of toxin type A in all matrices, the detection limits of toxin types E and F were comparable in both methods. The Tetracore ELISA method exhibited greater sensitivity in the detection of toxin type B in all matrices evaluated.