P1-117 Environmental Reservoirs of Salmonella spp. in Field and Water Samples Associated with North Carolina Tomato Production

Monday, August 4, 2014
Exhibit Hall D (Indiana Convention Center)
Diane Ducharme, North Carolina State University, Kannapolis, NC
Christopher Gunter, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Penelope Perkins-Veazie, North Carolina State University, Kannapolis, NC
Otto Simmons, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Lee-Ann Jaykus, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Jie Zheng, U.S. Food and Drug Administration-CFSAN, College Park, MD
Insook Son, U.S. Food and Drug Administration-CFSAN, College Park, MD
Eric Brown, U.S. Food and Drug Administration-CFSAN, College Park, MD
Rebecca Bell, U.S. Food and Drug Administration-CFSAN, College Park, MD
Introduction: Salmonella contamination of market tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum) is one of the leading causes of produce-associated foodborne outbreaks.  Current methods for on-farm control of microbial pathogens focus on general farming practices rather than crop- or pathogen-specific strategies.

Purpose: To identify and characterize Salmonella spp. within tomato production systems on three agriculturally diverse farms.  

Methods: Environmental samples were collected during the NC tomato production season in 2012 (July – September) and 2013 (June- September) from 3 farm locations.  Field (tomato fruit, blossom, leaf, weeds, soil) and water samples (n = 1010) were analyzed for Salmonella by enrichment using a modified BAM method as well as by real-time PCR.  Isolates were serotyped and genotyped by pulse-field gel electrophoresis.  Additionally, water samples were enumerated for generic E. coliusing the IDEXX Colilert and quanti-tray 2000 system.

Results: For 2012-2013, Salmonella was isolated in June (10 isolates, 2013 only), July (28 isolates), August (35 isolates) and September (42 isolates); 59% (68/115) of isolates from water, 33% (38/115) from sediment, 4% (5/115) from tomato fruit, and 3% (4/115) from soil.  Of the serotypes identified, 28% (32/115) were Paratyphi B (monophasic from water); 12% (14/115) were Newport (water and sediment); 7% (8/115) were Hartford (water and sediment); 4% (three sets of 5/15) were Agona, Montevideo, and Typhimurium (sediment, tomato, and water, respectively); with 1% (1/115) from Berta (sediment).  These findings suggest that particular serotypes may dominate unique tomato environmental niches.  Generic E. coli, using 235 CFU/100 ml from the proposed FSMA rules, predicted the presence or absence of Salmonellain water samples 81% (39/48) of the time.

Significance: This project provides baseline information on occurrence and environmental reservoirs of Salmonella spp. in tomatoes on diverse NC farms.  This information will support science-based recommendations for tomato production practices leading to reduced microbial contamination and protection of public health.