P1-166 Dry Talc Inoculum Preparation Procedure with Salmonella and the Surrogate (Enterococcus faecium) for Challenge Studies in Low-moisture Foods

Monday, August 4, 2014
Exhibit Hall D (Indiana Convention Center)
Elena Enache, Grocery Manufacturers Association, Washington, DC
Ai Kataoka, Grocery Manufacturers Association, Washington, DC
Glenn Black, Grocery Manufacturers Association, Washington, DC
Carla Napier, Grocery Manufacturers Association, Washington, DC
Richard Podolak, Grocery Manufacturers Association, Washington, DC
Melinda Hayman, Grocery Manufacturers Association, Washington, DC
Introduction: The food industry is preparing for the proposed Preventive Controls rule, recently published under the Food Safety Modernization Act, addressing preventive control measures for the biological hazards associated with low-moisture foods.  To accomplish this task, it is crucial to have a validated surrogate for process validation, and validated inoculation procedure.

Purpose: The objective of this study was to obtain dry inocula of Salmonella Tennessee and Enterococcus faecium and compare their stability over time in terms of survival and thermal resistance.

Methods: Two methods of cell growth were used: (1) cells harvested from lawns on tryptic soy agar (TSA-cells), and (2) cells from tryptic soy broth (TSB-cells), for dry inoculum preparation.  Concentrated cultures of each organism were inoculated onto talc powder, followed by incubation at 35°C for 24h, and held for additional 24h at room temperature (RT ~25°C) for complete dryness before sieving. The recovery of dry inoculum was monitored on tryptic soy agar. Heat resistance at 85°C of the dry inoculum on talc inoculated in a model peanut paste (50% fat and aw= 0.6) was determined for up to 30 days.

Results: The dry inoculum on talc for both cell-growth methods was stable in terms of survival and thermal resistance over 30 days.  In general, the dry inoculum on talc resulted in a higher cell concentration when TSA grown-cells were used, compared to TSB. However, the TSB grown cells had a significantly (P ˂ 0.05) greater heat resistance than TSA grown-cells (e.g., E. faecium TSB-cells D85°C = 3.43 min versus 2.68 for TSA-cells).  The surrogate had consistently greater heat resistance than Salmonella Tennessee (e.g., TSB-cells D85°C = 1.05 min), regardless of what cell-type was used for dry inoculum preparation.

Significance:   A dry inoculum of the surrogate for Salmonella appears to be more relevant and easier to use for process validation in low-moisture foods.