Purpose: To compare recovery levels of yeast and molds in NeoFilm Yeast and Mold, using either PBS or peptone water as a diluent, against the FDA/BAM reference method plating. Method performance was assessed for 5 food types: breaded chicken nuggets, dry pet food, orange juice concentrate, yogurt, and cake mix.
Methods: For each food, five separate sample homogenates were prepared with both diluents at three target inoculation levels: 102, 103, and 104. Each homogenate was either plated by the reference method or on NeoFilm. Data were statistically analyzed using a difference of means, P-value, and correlation coefficients.
Results: When using PBS as diluent, there were statistically significant differences only for orange juice concentrate at the 103 level (P = 0.01), with reference yielding a higher count than NeoFilm, and cake mix at the 103 level (P = 0.01), with NeoFilm yielding a higher count than reference. When using peptone water as diluent, there were statistically significant differences only for dry pet food at the 102 level (P = 10-4), with reference yielding a higher count than NeoFilm, and cake mix at the 102 and 103 levels (P = 0.01 and 0.001), with NeoFilm yielding higher counts than reference.
Significance: A high level of agreement was observed for the enumeration of yeast and molds as determined by NeoFilm Yeast and Mold and FDA/BAM reference methods. Incubation times of 48 h for peptone water and 72 h for PBS are recommended.