T6-02 An Environmental Scan of Food Safety Educational Initiatives Targeted at Consumers in the United States

Monday, July 27, 2015: 8:45 AM
C123 (Oregon Convention Center)
Nicole Arnold , North Carolina State University , Raleigh , NC
Shelley Feist , Partnership for Food Safety Education , Arlington , VA
Benjamin Chapman , North Carolina State University , Raleigh , NC
Introduction: In-home food safety practices can be influenced through messages provided by food safety educators. These messages are communicated to reduce risky practices that could potentially lead to foodborne illness. This information is a necessary step to a needs assessment to better describe the current population of food safety educators, their programs, and sources of information and materials. 

Purpose: Although many agencies, organizations, and educational outlets provide the public with food safety messages, there has not to date been a systematic collection of a landscape of whom is providing what information to what audiences.  

Methods: An online survey was developed with questions. The survey was distributed to the Partnership for Food Safety Education’s BAC Fighter (self-subscribed health and food safety educators) and food safety educators through Internet searches expanded through a snowball participant selection process. Food safety educators from different sectors such as academia, federal government, food retail, non-profits, public health agencies, and schools (K-12) were targeted.   

Results: Ninety percent (n = 469) of educational programs were delivered in-person, while 36% were delivered through online sources. Almost half of food safety educators (48%, n = 397) did not measure or were unaware if others measured impacts of their food safety outreach programs. When survey participants were asked whom their programming/outreach programs (n = 469) were designed to reach, children, parents of children and the elderly were ranked highest, while less than 15% of these programs targeted ethnicity based populations and farmers’ market vendors. 

Significance: Improvements can be made for educating consumers about food safety by addressing the gaps identified within the data gathered. These improvements may include greater usage of program evaluation and additional educational materials for underserved populations.