P2-146 The In-plant Performance of Acidified Sodium Chlorite as Affected by Application Parameters

Tuesday, July 30, 2013
Exhibit Hall (Charlotte Convention Center)
Jeremy M. Adler, Ecolab, Inc., Eagan, MN
Craig Ledbetter, Ecolab Inc., Eagan, MN
James White III, Ecolab, Inc., Eagan, MN
Deborah Klein, Ecolab, Inc., Eagan, MN
Cari Lingle, Ecolab Inc., Eagan, MN
Elaine Black, Ecolab Inc., Eagan, MN
Introduction: Validating application parameters of an antimicrobial intervention is essential for HACCP compliance.

Purpose: The purpose of these experiments was to define the optimal application parameters for acidified sodium chlorite (ASC) applied to beef sub-primals and parts and trim within a processing plant.

Methods: Portioned (100 cm2) beef sub-primals or parts and trim were inoculated with United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety Inspection Service approved pathogenic surrogate organism (5 Escherichia coli strains, 5 log CFU/cm2). Sub-primal samples were stored at 4°C or -20°C and tempered at 4°C (6 h) before conditioning and treatment. The surface of sub-primal samples was conditioned with water or a peroxyoctanoic and peroxyacetic acid mixture (POAA; 180-210 ppm, 1-2 s) directly before treatment with ASC (800 – 1100 ppm, pH 2.35 – 2.50) acidified with citric acid (CA) or sodium acid sulfate (SAS). ASC was applied in-plant to beef sub-primal samples within a top and bottom spray cabinet at 6.8, 7.9, 11.4, or 18.9 l/min for 18 or 30 s. Beef parts and trim were stored at 4°C and treated through an auger application system at 13.2 l/min for 15 s. Surviving E. coli (2 plants, 2 replicates per plant, 3 samples per repetition) were enumerated from samples after treatment. Counts (log CFU/cm2) were analyzed in the general linear model of Minitab and means were separated (α=0.05) using Fisher’s least significant difference.

Results: Fewer E. coli (P < 0.05; 0.4-0.5 log CFU/cm2) were recovered from sub-primals stored at 4°C than from those that were frozen and tempered (application surface temperatures of 4.3±1.0°C and -1.0±0.3°C, respectively). In general, conditioning the sub-primal surfaces before ASC treatment with water or POAA treatment and increasing the application volume above 6.8 l/min did not enhance (P ≥ 0.05) its efficacy. CA may be preferred as the acidulant of ASC as fewer (P < 0.05) E. coli were recovered from sub-primals (0.5-0.7 log CFU/cm2) and parts and trim (1 log CFU/cm2) than when SAS was the acidulant. 

Significance: These data may be used for the in-plant validation of ASC and indicate the optimal surface temperature, application volume, and acidulant for ASC when applied on beef sub-primals and parts and trim.