P1-135 Effect of Multi-phase Educational and Motivational Intervention on Cleanliness of Surfaces in a Commercial Kitchen

Monday, August 1, 2016
America's Center - St. Louis
David Buckley, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Jeffrey Anderson, The Procter and Gamble Co., Mason, OH
Jennifer Shields, The Procter and Gamble Co., Mason, OH
Charles Pettigrew, The Procter and Gamble Co., Mason, OH
Xiuping Jiang, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Angela Fraser, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Introduction: Cleaning and sanitizing food contact surfaces is one way to prevent cross contamination, a risk factor for foodborne disease.  However, according to a 2014 FDA trend analysis report, contaminated food surfaces and equipment remain a problem in foodservice operations, suggesting the need for targeted interventions.

Purpose: To determine the effect of a multi-phase, motivation-based educational intervention to improve the cleanliness of surfaces in a commercial kitchen.

Methods: The cleanliness of 9 objects (6 food contact (FC) and 3 non-food contact (NFC)) in one commercial kitchen were measured from June to August 2015 using adenosine triphosphate (ATP) (UXL100 Clean-Trace™ Surface ATP, 3M, Minnesota, USA) and protein (ALLTEC60 Clean-Trace™ Surface Protein, 3M) swabs. Two to three swabs (over ~4 cm2 of the surface) were collected from each object over three major stages of the study: baseline, procedural validation, and post-intervention. Surfaces were classified as clean if ATP measures were <300 relative light units (RLU) for FC; <1,000 RLU for non-food contact surfaces; and <3 µg of protein for both types of surfaces. The educational intervention, conducted after the baseline and procedural validation stages, consisted of 3 phases with the following motivational approaches: (1) management buy in, (2) monitoring and feedback using ATP and protein surface measurements, and (3) rewards.

Results: At baseline, 75% (n=9) of FC surfaces and 100% (n=7) of NFC surfaces were not clean based on ATP data, and 100% of surfaces (n=19) were not clean based on protein data. Post-intervention measures showed that 9 FC and 4 NFC surfaces were significantly cleaner (P<0.05) based on ATP while 3 FC and 4 NFC surfaces were significantly improved (P<0.05) based on protein. 

Significance: Select surfaces were significantly cleaner after workers were exposed to the educational and motivational intervention. Our three-phase intervention could be used as a model for future educational and motivational interventions targeting foodservice workers.