Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare heat resistance of Salmonella spp., L. monocytogenes, E. coli O157:H7, and E. faecium on multiple nut types.
Methods: Nuts were evaluated for heat resistance according to the Almond Board of California’s “Guidelines for using Enterococcus faecium NRRL B-2354 as a Surrogate Microorganism in Almond Process Validation.”
Results: Heat resistance of Salmonella spp. on almonds, peanuts, cashews, and macadamia nuts showed a 2.88±0.12, 2.57±0.11, 2.75±0.13, and 1.18±0.08 log reduction, respectively. Heat resistance of E. coli O157:H7 on almonds, peanuts, cashews, and macadamia nuts showed a 6.76±0.80, 7.40±0.00, 7.77±0.52, and 5.05±0.17 log reduction, respectively. Heat resistance of L. monocytogenes on almonds, peanuts, cashews, and macadamia nuts showed a 7.13±0.24, 6.01±0.17, 6.85±0.34, and 6.77±0.07 log reduction, respectively. Heat resistance of E. faecium on almonds, peanuts, cashews, and macadamia nuts showed a 1.58±0.28, 3.00±0.25, 1.76±0.09, and 0.68±0.05 log reduction, respectively.
Significance: Heat resistance of pathogens is not uniform across different nut types, and the amount of kill delivered by a lethality process cannot be applied to all nut types. E. faecium was shown to be a good surrogate for Salmonella spp. on almonds, peanuts, cashews, and macadamia nuts. L. monocytogenes and E. coli O157:H7 showed significantly lower heat resistance than Salmonella spp. and E. faecium.