P2-99 Lessons from the Field:  Evaluation of a Vomit/Diarrhea Clean-up Intervention Targeting Foodservice and Retail Food Workers

Tuesday, July 11, 2017
Exhibit Hall (Tampa Convention Center)
Morgan Chao , Clemson University , Clemson , SC
Cortney Leone , Clemson University , Clemson , SC
Kinsey Porter , Clemson University , Clemson , SC
Catherine Viator , RTI International , Houma , LA
Sheryl Cates , RTI International , Research Triangle Park , NC
Jonathan Blitstein , RTI International , Research Triangle Park , NC
Megan Clayton , RTI International , Research Triangle Park , NC
Angela Fraser , Clemson University , Clemson , SC
Introduction: Rigorous evaluations inform the evidence base for food safety education. Unfortunately, limited information is available in the literature to guide food safety educators in how to successfully conduct rigorous evaluations in real world retail/foodservice settings.

Purpose: To identify the challenges of evaluating a vomit/diarrhea clean-up intervention targeting retail/foodservice food workers.

Methods: Best practices to plan the evaluation of a multistate vomit/diarrhea clean-up intervention were followed, starting with reviewing the literature, framing the evaluation in a theory of behavior change, developing a logic model, and conducting a power analysis for sample size estimation. The evaluation was then conducted using a quasi-experimental research design. Educators (n=34) from 20 states were enrolled then assigned to a treatment (delivered intervention as part of food safety training) or control group (delivered standard training). Pre- and postintervention surveys were administered to persons enrolled in training courses to collect data about knowledge, attitudes, and practices.

Results: Recruiting and retaining study educators was challenging. Challenges included time constraints (educators with eight-hour trainings expressed concern about including additional materials, cancelled trainings due to low enrollment, and survey administration issues (online survey could only be sent to those who had provided email addresses at sign-up and paper survey could only be administered to those who arrived early to training). It was important to engage educators in the study and frequently communicate with them to address concerns. Recruiting training subjects was also challenging. Initially, we intended to include only managers at commercial/retail foodservice establishments, however, because the eligibility rate was lower than anticipated, we relaxed our screening criteria to include institutional foodservice managers.

Significance: Our experiences can help food safety educators anticipate and avoid specific challenges when evaluating interventions targeting retail/foodservice workers.