T3-03 Educating Tailgaters on Best Food Safety Practices at College Football Tailgates

Monday, July 10, 2017: 2:00 PM
Room 15 (Tampa Convention Center)
Mary Yavelak , North Carolina State University , Raleigh , NC
John Luchansky , U.S. Department of Agriculture-ARS-ERRC , Wyndmoor , PA
Anna Porto-Fett , U.S. Department of Agriculture-ARS-ERRC , Wyndmoor , PA
Jill Hochstein , University of Nebraska-Lincoln , Lincoln , NE
Benjamin Chapman , North Carolina State University , Raleigh , NC
Introduction: Preliminary research shows the majority of participants at collegiate football tailgates in the United States do not report using a food thermometer while preparing meat. Food preparation at temporary events like tailgates, community gatherings, and festivals requires implementation of safe food handling practices as such atypical settings can increase the risk of foodborne illness.

Purpose: Project objectives focused on educating consumers about safe food handling practices using hands-on demonstrations at a NC State University tailgate in November, 2016.

Methods: Following a semistructured script, trained individuals educated participants on proper food thermometer use; temperature of meat versus meat color; cleaning and sanitizing of utensils and work surfaces; and personal hygiene. Each station accommodated small groups of four to eight people, which allowed participants to discuss the topic and ask questions. Participants were also given a food thermometer and additional food safety information.

Results: Efficacy of demonstrations was assessed using surveys on tailgaters’ thermometer use, including technique, frequency, and food products before and after the demonstration. In total (n=257), 57.6% of participants reported using a food thermometer before the demonstration, and 42.4% denied use of a food thermometer. Only 15.4% of participants who reported using a food thermometer (n=148) reported use all the time while cooking meat. Of those who reported using food thermometers (n=148), most were used when cooking pork (74.3%), beef (68.9%), and chicken (60.8%), when participants could choose all that apply. Follow-up showed changes in thermometer use, knowledge, and self-reported practices.

Significance: As many nonprofessional food preparers cook food at temporary events, education of safe food handling practices is essential to reduce the risk of foodborne illness. Results from long-term data collection will provide insight on the effectiveness of the education demonstration so it can be optimized and tested as a large-scale food safety intervention.