T2-04 Significance of HACCP Implementation on the Microbiological Quality of Foods and Environmental Hygiene in Mass Feeding Facilities in Greece during the Period 2003 - 2010

Wednesday, May 11, 2016: 2:15 PM
Kokkali Room (Megaron Athens International Conference Center)
Constantin Genigeorgis, University of California, Davis and Aristotelion University, Davis, CA
Niki Thalassinaki, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
Chris Panoulis, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
Introduction: Conformity to EC178/2002 and 852/2004 demands the establishment of validation procedures and microbiological controls in food production facilities.

Purpose: Microbiological assessment of food production phases in mass feeding facilities as affected by HACCP implementation.

Methods: ISO methods were followed for detection of Salmonella spp., L. monocytogenes, E. coli and S. aureus. Presence of Salmonella spp., L. monocytogenes, > 10 cfu/g E. coli, and >100 cfu/g S. aureus defined an unacceptable sample. Statistical analysis included linear regression.

Results: We surveyed 28 hotels, 8 fast food and 8 catering facilities. Of ingredient samples in HACCP using (group A, 1778, samples) and not using (Group B, 1253 samples) facilities 17.4, 9.4, 10.9 1.6% and 26, 14.4, 18.3, 3.1% were unacceptable for E. coli, S. aureus, L. monocytogenes and Salmonella spp., respectively. For ready-to-eat foods in hotels of Group A (1778 samples) and Group B (1258 samples) the respective figures were 4.2, 3.3, 7.7, 0% and 29.4, 27, 8, 31.2 and 2.5%.  The figures for Group A and B  fast food facilities were 4.5, 1, 2.9, 0% and 9, 10.2, 15.4, 0% and for catering  0.7, 1.4, 4.7, 0% and 14, 13.2, 23.8% respectively. The unacceptable Group A and B environmental samples were 1.3, 2.6, 8.9% and 29.3, 31.1, 32.2% for E. coli, coliforms and L. monocytogenes, respectively. The difference between Group A and B for all facilities, environmental samples, ready–to-eat foods and agents was significant (< 0.01) but not for entering ingredients (p 0.2-0.5). The percent reduction in unacceptable samples after HACCP implementation was calculated and was impressive.

Significance: The findings support universal regulatory enforcement of HACCP in mass feeding establishments.