P2-69 Efficacy of Lactic Acid, Hot Water, and Acidified Sodium Chlorite for the Reduction of Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) Utilizing Chilled Beef Subprimals and Escherichia coli O157:H7 as an Indicator

Tuesday, July 30, 2013
Exhibit Hall (Charlotte Convention Center)
Nanditha Jasti, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX
W. Evan Chaney, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX
Alejandro Echeverry, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX
Guy H. Loneragan, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX
Kendra Nightingale, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX
Mindy M. Brashears, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX
Introduction: Testing for the presence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and the six non-O157 STECs in ground beef and non-intact beef products will impose greater costs for the beef processing industries. This would also pose a challenge for them to test for O157 and non-O157 STECs in the beef products.

Purpose: To quantify reductions of each non-O157 STEC serogroup achieved by lactic acid (LA), hot water (HW) and acidified sodium chlorite (ASC) simultaneously with E. coli O157:H7 on chilled beef subprimals.

Methods: Chilled subprimals (n = 86) are utilized and four subprimals are randomly assigned to each serogroup and antimicrobial intervention (2 control + 2 interventions). For each serogroup and intervention, four subprimals were inoculated by submersion (1 minute) into a 3-strain cocktail, subjected to a 30 minute attachment period and placed in a chad cabinet for intervention application.  Sample swabs were collected both pre- and post-intervention and plated onto MacConkey agar.

Results: When treated with LA, O157 showed 0.65-log reduction while the non- O157 STEC serogroups showed 0.24 to 0.58-log reduction except O103, which showed no numerical reduction. STEC O157 when treated with HW and ASC exhibited 0.61 and 0.44-log reductions, respectively. HW and ASC achieved reductions in all the six non-O157 serogroups ranging from 0.07 to 0.43 and 0.26 to 0.83-log reductions, respectively. When treated with LA, non-O157 STEC serogroup reductions were not statistically different from E. coli O157 reductions, with the exception of serogroup O103 (P = 0.011), but are all significantly different from E. coli O157 reductions, with the exception of O121, when treated with HW. Reductions observed for non-O157 STEC serogroups treated with ASC were not significantly different from E. coli O157.

Significance: Although not universal among all serogroups and interventions (i.e., O103 and LA), E. coli O157 may act as an effective indicator for detecting reductions among the 6 non-O157 STEC serogroups.